Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8303472: Display name for region TR #12816

Closed

Conversation

justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu commented Mar 1, 2023

This PR changes the English name for the region TR, from Turkey to Türkiye. Although this change is included in the upcoming CLDR v43, it should be applied as a spot change so that it can be back-ported properly (As it is a common English region name).

This change targets both the CLDR and COMPAT data.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12816/head:pull/12816
$ git checkout pull/12816

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12816
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12816/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12816

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12816

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12816.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 1, 2023

👋 Welcome back jlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 1, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 1, 2023

@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build
  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added build build-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Mar 1, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 1, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please supply test cases with these changes (sun/text/resources/LocaleDataTest.java), also copyright year changes for COMPAT properties.
Otherwise LGTM

@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ TL=Timor-Leste
TM=Turkmenistan
TN=Tunisia
TO=Tonga
TR=Turkey
TR=T�rkiye
Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj Mar 1, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this is fine, but please confirm that this ends up correct u-umlaut when you get the text. It is somewhat a rare case where ISO-8859-1 has the character and the byte sequence differs between ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for pointing that out, I switched it to just be a unicode escaped ü, as that would be more consistent with the rest of the file. I also added the changes to the test files like you suggested.

@naotoj
Copy link
Member

naotoj commented Mar 1, 2023

/label remove build

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the build build-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 1, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 1, 2023

@naotoj
The build label was successfully removed.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 2, 2023

@justin-curtis-lu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8303472: Display name for region TR

Reviewed-by: naoto

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 38 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ae797c6: 8301117: Remove old_size param from ResizeableResourceHashtable::resize()
  • 5085bd5: 8297936: Use reachabilityFence to manage liveness in ClassUnload tests
  • 379f206: 8303198: System and Runtime.exit() resilience to logging errors
  • 80739e1: 8279619: [JVMCI] improve EncodedSpeculationReason
  • 7449e1c: 8299807: newStringNoRepl should avoid copying arrays for ASCII compatible charsets
  • c6de66c: 8303516: HFAs with nested structs/unions/arrays not handled correctly on AArch64
  • cbdc7a6: 8303481: CancelRequestTest assertTrue failing with AssertionError due to java.util.concurrent.CompletionException: java.io.EOFException: EOF reached while reading
  • 8bf084c: 8303499: [s390x] ProblemList StressStackOverflow
  • ff364c1: 8301622: ProcessTools.java compilation gets ThreadDeath deprecation warning
  • df9aad0: 8297955: LDAP CertStore should use LdapName and not String for DNs
  • ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/4c985e527a4a03d5a78d85a145aa41c1843a3e22...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@naotoj) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 2, 2023
@justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Mar 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2023

@justin-curtis-lu
Your change (at version 5bedc6a) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@naotoj
Copy link
Member

naotoj commented Mar 3, 2023

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2023

Going to push as commit e3016c1.
Since your change was applied there have been 38 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ae797c6: 8301117: Remove old_size param from ResizeableResourceHashtable::resize()
  • 5085bd5: 8297936: Use reachabilityFence to manage liveness in ClassUnload tests
  • 379f206: 8303198: System and Runtime.exit() resilience to logging errors
  • 80739e1: 8279619: [JVMCI] improve EncodedSpeculationReason
  • 7449e1c: 8299807: newStringNoRepl should avoid copying arrays for ASCII compatible charsets
  • c6de66c: 8303516: HFAs with nested structs/unions/arrays not handled correctly on AArch64
  • cbdc7a6: 8303481: CancelRequestTest assertTrue failing with AssertionError due to java.util.concurrent.CompletionException: java.io.EOFException: EOF reached while reading
  • 8bf084c: 8303499: [s390x] ProblemList StressStackOverflow
  • ff364c1: 8301622: ProcessTools.java compilation gets ThreadDeath deprecation warning
  • df9aad0: 8297955: LDAP CertStore should use LdapName and not String for DNs
  • ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/4c985e527a4a03d5a78d85a145aa41c1843a3e22...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 3, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 3, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Mar 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2023

@naotoj @justin-curtis-lu Pushed as commit e3016c1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants